Teaching children to pray is very important. The purpose of prayer is to help your child develop a relationship with the Lord. Teaching your child how to develop love and patience helps them better understand the nature of God. Here are some tips to help you.

Praying should be out loud. Your child may not readily understand what praying is. To help try replacing the word "pray" with the word "talk." Encourage them to talk with God. It is said of men of old that they walked and talked with God.

Teaching your children love and patience is important when they are learning to pray. These two virtues when practiced keep our hearts soft and teachable. The prophet Samuel was able hear the still small voice of the Lord because his heart was teachable.

Part of praying is asking the Lord for the things we want and need. When we teach children what love is we help them feel positive and hopeful about their future. Their prayers will be more uplifting and from the heart.

Love is the most powerful force in the universe. When children are little they may not understand the word "love" but they certainly understand the emotion. You have been there for them from the beginning and you can share with them how God has been there for both of you from the beginning.

We all have learned patience when we pray because as we have grown older we have accepted that God does not immediately answer our prayers. A child, however, has not yet learned this. Therefore, we need to teach them patience.

Our children can learn to be patient when we set them a good example. When I look at the times I become impatient I see an opportunity to teach my children. When I am driving for example, I do not have to be the first guy there. You can share with your children that this is patient. You are willing to wait a little longer to arrive at your destination just like you are willing to wait on the Lord.

When we teach our children to pray we also need to teach them about love and patience. God is love and will always answer our prayers. We must be patient though and be willing to wait for him to answer us.

Understanding the Patient's Bill of Rights will enable you to take a pro-active role in your medical care, understand your rights as a patient and minimize the occurrence of medical errors resulting in hospital malpractice or doctor malpractice. The Patient's Bill of Rights has three major goals:

1. To increase patient confidence in the health care system by:

* Ensuring a fair medical system that is responsive to patients' needs;

* Providing patients with processes through which they can address their concerns;

* Encouraging patients to a take pro-active role in their medical care.

2. To emphasis the significance of the relationship between patient and medical provider; and

3. To promote a pro-active health care attitude by the patient by establishing rights and responsibilities of the patient and provider.

There are 8 key sections to the Patient's Bill of Rights.

Information Disclosure You have the right to receive accurate and easily understood information about health plans, health professionals, care facilities and consumer assistance programs. If you require aid to obtain or understand this information, you are entitled to appropriate services to assist you.

Choice of Providers and Plans You have the right to a sufficient choice of medical providers to ensure that you have access to high-quality care at the time it is required.

Access to Emergency Services You have the right to services in emergency situations in whatever location you are in. Health care plans should provide funding in those circumstances where a patient has acute symptoms that indicate the patient's health may be jeopardized without immediate medical care. You should not need authorization from your plan before medical attention is provided.

Participation in Treatment Decisions You have both the right and responsibility to participate in decisions regarding your care. If you are unable to exercise your rights and responsibilities, a duly authorized family member or other representative may undertake these on your behalf.

Respect and Nondiscrimination You must not be discriminated against by providers on the basis on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, genetic information or method of payment. You have the right to considerate, respectful care from care providers.

Confidentiality of Health Information You have the right to have your discussions with your health providers held in confidence. Your medical records must also be confidentially protected. You have the right to access your records and copy them, as well as request amendments to the records.

Complaints and Appeals You have the right to an unbiased procedure for resolution of complaints regarding providers, facilities and plans. This procedure includes an internal review and independent external review.

Consumer Responsibilities You are expected to assume reasonable responsibilities to promote the success of your care. These responsibilities include healthy dietary and exercise habits, disclosing all relevant information to health providers, following providers' advice, avoid knowingly spreading disease, being respectful to other patients and recognize the care facilities obligations for their care as well, being informed about your plan and reporting any wrongdoing to the appropriate authorities.

While this is a general overview of the Patient's Bill of Rights, it provides you with a basic knowledge of your rights and responsibilities for the next time you require medical assistance. If you feel you are the victim of doctor malpractice or hospital malpractice you should contact a qualified medical malpractice attorney immediately for advice.

A Patient's Right to Die and Be Placed on Life Support

Terry Shiavo's story
One of the most blatant episodes of life support struggle, Terry Shiavo's story was making headlines for many months now as the unconscious woman who for 15 years was living on substances she received from her feeding tube became the focus of a legal battle between her husband and her parents. Life support that is one of the most controversial issues of today's medical practice has served to pump funds and human effort into the rescue of a meaningless and empty life of that woman, like the lives of many other patients who are tormented rather than saved by the artificial prolongation of their lives via life support systems.
Numerous courts considered the case, and now the battle came to an end as Terry is died from starvation caused by the removal of her breathing tube on March 18. Schiavo collapsed in 1990 from brain damage caused by a chemical imbalance that resulted from an eating disorder (Torday 2005). Since the time she lost consciousness from lack of oxygen, she was kept in the center in a persistent vegetative state in a hospice in Pinellas Park, Florida.
Terry's legal custodian, her husband Michael Schiavo, believed that Terry should be allowed to die and so insisted on the removal of the tube. Her parents, Bob And Mary Schindler, on the contrary, insisted that Terry 's life should be sustained further arguing that their daughter was responsive to outside stimuli (Word 2005). Both sides had their supporters that stage street protests in support of their viewpoints, and media, both in the US and abroad, have been following the story closely. Michael Schiavo insisted that his wife made her wishes and told her uncle and best friend that she would not like to spend the rest of her life in a vegetative state. George Felos, an attorney for Michael Schiavo, conveyed her words in this way: "She said, 'I don't want to be kept alive artificially -- no tubes for me. I want to go when my time comes. Take the tubes and everything out" (Barrett 2005). Terri's parents, in contrast, thought that their daughter's state might improve with intensive therapy, and make every effort to keep her alive.
The relatives fighting over Schiavo's unconscious body have made numerous attempts to resolve the issue in court. In seven years, the case was heard by as many as 19 Florida judges (Torday 2005). All of them invariably supported Michael Schiavo, refusing to order the reinsertion of the tube. The final removal of the feeding tube occurred on the rejection of the Schindlers' petition to the Florida Supreme Court where the couple's request was turned down on March 26. The Schindlers five times tried to turn to the US Supreme Court that always refused to get involved. The parents' appeal to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta also met with no success (Torday 2005).
The case that seems to be a purely family matter was taken up by the highest US authorities, including the US President George Bush and Congress. George W. Bush on March 21 signed the law that allowed the Schindlers to seek the reinsertion of the tube. The law had before been passed by both the House and the Senate, with a 203-58 vote in the House. Opponents of the bill, including Michael Schiavo himself, were vigorously protesting against the action they saw as interference in people's private life. Bush, however, commented on the passage of the bill in the following way: "Democrats and Republicans in Congress came together last night to give Terri Schiavo's parents another opportunity to save their daughter's life." "This is a complex case with serious issues," he added. "But in extraordinary circumstances like this, it is wise to always err on the side of life" (Barrett 2005). This action nevertheless also failed as the federal judge turned the last appeal down, allowing Terri to drift towards death.
One more high-ranking government official who intervened in the case was Florida Governor Jeb Bush. He supported Terri's parents and argued for the reinsertion of the tube. Finally, he declared that he would not order the reattachment of the tube. He was obviously in no position to order this after the numerous court decisions in favor of Michael Schiavo and the collapse of the bill in the Florida Senate that called for the reinsertion of the tube.
Controversial Right-to-Die Cases
The crux of the case seems to be not a life-and-death decision, but the debate over the extent to which the government and society can interfere in the life of an individual person or family. Most cases considered hitherto seem to indicate that a person's life has to be left in the hands of nature in case a terminally ill patient falls into a vegetative state, but forbid physician-assisted suicide
An example is the case Washington v. Glucksberg that was decided in the US Supreme Court on June 26, 1997 (No. 521 U.S. 702 (1997)). Dr. Harold Glucksberg in this case asked the question: "Did Washington's ban on physician assisted-suicide violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause by denying competent terminally ill adults the liberty to choose death over life?" (OYEZ, 1997). The court disagreed with the claim that the state's ban violates basic human rights and liberties. The denial was grounded in the belief that the practice was "offensive to our national traditions and practices" (OYEZ, 1997), anf lifting the ban can be detrimental to national liberties and interests.
A similar Vacco v. Quill case (521 U.S. 793 (1997)) decided on June 26, 1997 sought to prove that "New York's ban on physician-assisted suicide violate[s] the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by allowing competent terminally ill adults to withdraw their own lifesaving treatment, but denying the same right to patients who could not withdraw their own treatment and could only hope that a physician would do so for them" (OYEZ, 1997). The court ruled against the claim, pointing to a difference between euthanasia and removal of lifesaving treatment, since physician-assisted suicide includes causation and intent to terminate a patient's life.
Fifteen years ago, the Supreme Court acknowledged that the patient has a constitutional right to refuse life-saving treatment. However, it demanded from the family or custodians the proof of the patient's wishes. This, for instance, was required of the family Nancy Cruzan who was in a state of coma at the moment her case was considered in court. The case was returned to Missouri state court that arrived at the conclusion that she really had stated her wish to die before she lapsed into a coma. The case of the 25-year-old woman who "careened off the road, flipped over, and was thrown from her car into a ditch" in 1983 (University of Virginia) became the first right-to-die case to be heard in the US Supreme Court.
More Recent Cases
One of the most notorious cases in the right-to-die discussion is the one related to the activities of Doctor Kevorkian, a controversial medical practitioner who sought to prove his right to assist his patients in dying. That is why on March 26, 1999, in Michigan he was found guilty of second-degree murder. Death With Dignity Act, accepted in 1994 in Oregon voters, by a narrow margin of 51% to 49%, is believed to have been inspired by Kevorkian's activities. Under this act, a competent adult is entitled to a request of a lethal injection by a medical professional in case he or she is terminally ill.
In Spain, the case of Ramon Sampedro became the focus of public attention as the man paralysed in an accident spent 29 years trying to defend his right to assisted suicide. The legal rulings he sought were obtained from Spanish courts as well as the European Commission in Strasbourg. After experiencing the disabling accident at the age of 29, he only died at 55.
Scholarly Evidence
In making decisions about a comatose patient's destiny, the court has to differentiate between various conditions. Thus, Terri Schiavo was in persistent vegetative state (PVS), one in which a patient is more likely to obtain permission to terminate life-sustaining treatment from a court. There are also patients who are in a 'minimally conscious state" (MCS), and who "unlike PVS patients, are able to feel pain (and pleasure); however, because they are so limited in their means of expression, no one can be sure to what extent a particular MCS patient is experiencing pain, suffering, and humiliation" (Mello, 1999). However, because these patients are still able to feel pain and suffering resulting from prolonged immobilization, they are in even greater need of permission to remove life support systems to end their lives. This argument is very important in evaluating the option of removal of the life support system: if the patient is able to feel pain and suffering (and it is likely that the physicians are not always able to adequately assess one's sufferings).
Now we see more and more cases in which doctors argue against sustaining the life of the patient, saying that "that medicine must not be used to torture the dying" (Morreim 1994). This perspective of the physicians has to be endorsed on the grounds that doctors better than those removed from the medical field realize that the right to die will protect the patient from unnecessary suffering. In cases when patients are not expected by medical experts to recover, it is "morally mandatory to cease aggressive treatment" (Morreim 1994), since future treatment is pointless and often cruel.
Denial of life support as a way to prolong the patient's suffering is related to the preservation of what many view as an intrinsic human right the right to decide on one's own life and death. This conclusion is inevitable "respecting [the patient's] autonomy as expressed by the substituted judgment of [her] surrogate agent and consistent with the principle of nonmaleficence" (Bednarz, 2000). Even though the person in a vegetative state may not be considered as a fully-fledged person, deep inside the person may be thinking and feeling and his or her decisions have to be respected.
It is necessary, of course, to agree the course of action taken to the patient's previous wishes. Thus, courts have adopted a 'clear-and- convincing standard' of these wishes that is often unnecessary to patients. To complicate the custodian's task, "courts typically require that the patient have envisioned the precise medical situation he is now in when he made the statement expressing a preference for nontreatment" (Mello, 1999).
Conclusion
In conclusion, exact criteria for preservation or withdrawal of life support systems have not yet been developed by the legal system. The right to die should be an inherent right of the human being living in today's world where people have more and more control over their rights. Courts have a point in demanding proof of the patient's earlier wishes; however, since this evidence cannot always be gathered, this claim often results in people being kept alive artificially at the time when they do not really want to be reduced to a life of a comatose body. To simplify the court decisions on these cases, it would be useful to include a question on life support in the standard procedure of insurance policy preparation. Then every person who has signed on the paper, stating the wish that the life support system be removed in case of terminal illness or coma can be safely allowed to die in peace.
Besides, one needs to consider the economic aspect of the matter. A person lying prostrate in a developed nation that can afford the kind of treatment to keep the person alive is consuming a lot of financial and human resources that can be put to better use. We live at a time when a lot of people are still in need of food, clothing and most elementary things; at the same time, huge funds are being used to sustain the balance between life and death for specific persons.
The case for removal of life support is especially vivid with respect to patients, such as those in a minimally conscious state, who can still feel pain and suffering. These people should be unnecessarily tormented at the time when their chances of survival are minimal. The society would be more merciful in allowing these patients to die rather than subject them to sufferings that last years.

Produced by ProfEssays ( www.professays.com ) - professional custom essay writing service: custom essays, custom term papers, custom academic papers, custom admission essays, custom research papers, compositions, book reports, case study. No plagiarism, high quality, prompt delivery.

Common relationship error: men don’t respond fast enough when their significant others are in dire straits, emotionally. Chances are, you have waited for long, maybe too long, till she is genuinely disturbed, before you’ve shown that you are concerned. That is a serious blunder. As is the way with women, they won’t always make a clean breast of it and admit that they are distressed. What they will tend to do is drop hints and hope that you can read their minds. The reason for this extraordinary expectation? Women are pretty good mind readers themselves.

Most women you’ll meet will have that ability of putting themselves in someone else’s shoes. They know, intuitively, when you have a hard day or want more of her attention. They are just made that way, and believe that you are too. If you want to keep the woman in your life satisfied, you have to work on this a little bit. Make no secret of your love for her; be expressive. Listen, all ears, to what she has to say. If you listen, you can make better sense of her needs. You may think you already know about them, but to be honest, there’s more chance than one in a million that you don’t. This is one of the major reasons why women end their relationships with men.

If you have no clue as to how to make your relationship click, you have tough times ahead. The worst imaginable situation is when it gets bad enough for both of you, so you think that a break up is the best option. At these times, it is strangely difficult to focus on your day’s jobs, and even eat or sleep.

When you are through with this article, you’ll know how to sail smoothly through these phases of your life, and how to get you ex back with minimal pain and hurt on both sides.

Before anything else, you have to realize that your ex is not necessarily happy with the decision to break up. It is saddening to be the one to terminate the relationship so precious to both of you. Even though the two of you had zany problems, enough so she had to call it a day, she will surely miss your presence in her life, especially if you spent a lot of time together and did things with each other.

So how do you get back together with your ex with the minimum hassle?

DO NOT make your advances obvious. After you ex has had some time to cool off, you might call or SMS her. You can ask her out for a friendly chat. It would be smart to select a non-date like place for this meeting. DO NOT entreat her to accept you back. What you have to work on is enjoying the time spent with each other, just as you did in the early days of your relationship. Your ex will recall that you can have an amazing time together, and later, you can have a frank conversation and sort out all your troubles.

Remember, you have to be patient. Slow and steady is the way to go. Your ex will be back to you in a jiffy, with little stress and no heartbreaks.

FORMER Miss Sarawak-Malaysia Marlene Lim Hui Nee is no run-of-the-mill beauty queen, blessed, as she is, with a high IQ that matches her good looks. 

The 24-year-old looks-plus-brains beauty from Miri recently returned to her hometown after her studies in Perth, Australia. It was a four-year pharmacy course but she had to extend it by one more year because of her involvement in beauty pageants.

thesundaypost talked to Marlene in her office at Club Infinity in Faradale Garden to find out what makes her tick as a model, beauty queen and pharmacist all rolled into one.

The former student of SMK Dato Permaisuri and SRK Jalan Bintang in Miri not only has what it takes to grace the catwalk and win beauty contests but also earn a university degree in a field that requires A grades in science subjects like physics, chemistry and biology.

During the interview, Marlene, a Capricorn, touched on some of the problems faced by the pharmaceutical profession, especially the tendency to give patients prescriptions without a satisfactory explanation.

“I hope to change the perception that people can take any kind of medication without proper advice from doctors or pharmacists. For example, there are many kinds of drugs for high blood pressure but not all are suitable or safe.”

She spent two years in Prime College doing her Cambridge A Levels (science) before leaving for Perth to study pharmacy.

Her secondary education was eventful — most of her teachers remember she was an active and diligent head prefect.

She represented her school in Malay and English speech and debating contests and later also the Leo Club in many events, picking up the Outstanding Secretary Award in 2001 as the only Sarawakian from District 308-A2 to have done so.

“All these helped me a lot in developing my leadership, organisational and public speaking skills.”

Marlene intends to return to Perth for a year-long training to gain professional experience in pharmacy. She will return to Miri to do the required one-year pre-registration service and up to three years of public service working for the government to qualify for the pharmacist’s licence.

“I hope to be able to serve with the Miri General Hospital during this time,” she said.

She speaks Mandarin with a Cantonese accent as a result of picking up the dialect from her housemates during her pharmacy course but she comes from a Hokkien family.

Marlene admits to being rather “tomboyish” while growing up but she was also very studious and active in school activities.

Asked how she got started in modelling, she said it was by chance that she was spotted wearing pants and T-shirts by someone called Josephine Ching from a modeling agency whom she met at a salon.

“She liked my tall lean figure and introduced me to part-time modelling. I was 18 then. My course mates and I were out asking for donations in aid of the Blind Centre at the time,” she recalled.

That was when she shed her tomboy image and took up fashion and modeling seriously.

Winning her first title — Miss Miri-World 2002 — blew her away because she lifted the crown despite her inexperience on the catwalk and lack of fashion or beauty sense.

“I was even more surprised when I won my first national title in the Miss Malaysia Queen International 2006 — I was the shortest and the least experienced,” she confessed.

Marlene wowed the judges who never expected a small town girl from Sarawak to be more knowledgeable and eloquent than her peninsular counterparts.

“Some people even teased that I was a ‘kampung girl’ but I believe if I’m true to myself, people can sense it and good judges can see through pretentious girls,” she said.

In 2005, she won the Miss Sarawak-Malaysia title plus two other subtitles, and was also a finalist in Miss Malaysia-World 2005.

Other titles included Miss Sarawak Earth 2006 plus four subtitles, and a second runner-up spot in Miss Malaysia Earth 2006.

Third in a family of five siblings — two brothers and two sisters — Marlene recalled that her mother was strict “but she is also very supportive.”

Her parents did not stop her taking part in beauty contests — they were confident she could look after herself.

“In fact, mum was very supportive, making time to watch my shows — she even helped choose my wardrobe,” Marlene enthused.

Her sisters gave her ideas and helped look for the things she needed while her father was very proud of what she was doing.

“As for my brothers, they used to tease me about my heavy make-ups,” Marlene fondly remembered.

In Perth, she was placed in the top 12 out of hundreds of contestants in the Curtin Idol 2008 competition.

In her modelling debut, she faced some problems getting used to the catwalk.

“I wasn’t taught the basics — I learned from doing shows and watching videos. Going overseas and participating in fashion shows and events also helped.”

Relating her experience in beauty contests, she said people tended to take her less seriously because she was from Sarawak and did not dress up or put on make-up all the time.

“But I surprised them when I stepped onto the stage, especially during the Q & A,” she said.

Another problem was befriending people who didn’t really take her as a friend as “all they think about is winning and getting famous.”

According to Marlene, although most pageants seem to highlight charity as the main theme, most times, it’s not really the case. Usually, it’s orientated towards publicity, profit and fame.

She claimed the results could sometimes be pre-determined, especially when the winner, other than having a pretty face, could neither speak proper English nor have a deep knowledge of Malaysian culture or history.

“Sometimes, girls are chosen just to make up the numbers — they do so many previews that the whole meaning of ‘true women essence’ is lost because the whole thing feels like a showgirl contest,” she said.

She also noted that local beauty pageants were getting more commercialised.

“I guess that’s why the quality of participants has gone down because educated girls are not keen to take part. I’m a straightforward person — I say it like it is.”

To comments that it’s degrading for women to parade on catwalks in bikini like in a cattle show, she said everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion.

“The organisers are responsible to make the girls look elegant even in their bikinis. If I’m asked to do anything indecent in swimwear, I will voice my opinion because at the end of the day, I (not the organisers) will be judged by the audience. Sometimes the girls just follow what they are told to do.”

She said the main purpose of a swimwear round was to show the healthy body of a woman … that she was not anorexic or anything extreme.

“It also portrays her confidence and how well she carries herself in public. A woman will never look cheap if she knows how to carry herself.”

Marlene has groomed many models and beauty contestants, among whom are Amy Teo (first runner-up Miss Sarawak World 2006), Charlene Chai (Miss Sarawak Model of the World 2008 and first runner-up Miss Chinatown Sarawak 2007) and Natalie Chiaw (Miss Malaysia Global Queen 2008, Miss Global Queen 2008 International Level Miss Charm and second runner-up Miss Cheongsam Malaysia 2008).

On the difference between modelling and beauty contest, she said the former usually did not have a Q&A session and even if it did, it won’t so important compared to beauty pageants.

“In modelling, body proportion, height, poise as well as catwalk and posing skills are very important, not forgetting being photogenic. Sometimes, a model can have an attitude or other social problems but these are often excused. A modelling career usually flourishes following a successful contest — the models can then get more assignments and endorsements.”

On the other hand, she pointed out, a beauty pageant focused more on personality, the Q&A session and the way the contestants think and express themselves.

“Most judges can see if the answers are memorised or if they do not come from the heart. Sometimes, a tall and pretty girl can be the centre of attention but does not win due to lack of personality.

“Contestants should have a standard acceptable criterion — height, education level or experience — and are expected to carry themselves well in public as they represent the desirable qualities of women in general.

“Upon winning a pageant, a beauty queen gains social recognition and normally carries out various charity works or endorses a cause she believes in,” she said.

On the prospects of a modelling career in Miri, Marlene said an aspiring model was paid up to RM50 per show while higher rates like RM150 or more may be offered to title-holders. Models could get higher rates in West Malaysia and overseas.

“Sponsors and organisers prefer title-winning models because of public expectations and should therefore be willing to pay more for the fame and increased publicity.

“I feel sorry for title-holders who grab just any offers — even when the rate is low — because it will lower their value in the eyes of the client,” she noted.

Marlene was fortunate to have been guided by the right group of people. To aspiring models and beauty queens, her advice is to stay focused and not be distracted by the ‘glamour’ of the event.

She strongly believes academic qualifications are very important for a secure future, saying beauty and youth cannot last forever.

Asked if she intended to migrate to Australia, she said she would return to settle down in Miri after her training in Perth. She has plans to develop her career in event management and pharmacy both in Malaysia and Australia.

Although the two fields are very different, Marlene has a knack for management and multi-tasking — she is used to handling a few projects simultaneously and always ready to learn new things and improve.

She said she was holding on to event management because she owed it to the people who had helped and were still helping her.

“Event management will still be a part of my life — I’ll continue to do it for charity. Also, it’s important to have responsible people around — it makes the job a lot easier because things get done.”

Marlene devotes a lot of her time to charity work … and was in the forefront of organising the recent National Autism Society of Malaysia (Nasom) Charity Fashion Gala Runway Show on Dec 19 at Boulevard Fair. All the proceeds, including salaries of her models and her own, were donated to the Nasom Miri branch.

Among the charity events and fashion shows she had organised were Model Search of the Year 2005 (national level) where nearly RM40,000 was raised for Miri’s first Palliative Centre in the General Hospital and the Miss Model of the World Miri-Sibu-Bintulu 2007.

Ultimately though, she intends to concentrate more on her career as a pharmacist and her sisters will help her run a new studio-cum-boutique they are setting up in Perth this year.

Her hobbies include reading, singing (in any languages), karaoke, and dancing (especially modern and belly dancing). For holidays, she prefers Hong Kong, Singapore, or China.

For the moment, Marlene, a big fan of Hollywood actor Richard Gere, has no time for romance but admits to being particularly fond of “someone.”

On marriage, she said: “Only when I’m ready and when the right guy comes along.”

She loves children and her whole family is crazy about kids.

“I would love to have three to five kids … five is my dream number,” she said.

Take a word of advice from an NYC leading plaintiff’s medical malpractice law firm specializing in physician and hospital mistakes and errors– The Najdovski Law Firm PLLC located at 55 Broad St, one block off Wall Street in the Financial District of Lower Manhattan. Fortunately there are now abundant resources on the Internet that allow patients to research potential hospital before they are admitted to a particular hospital. The Najdovski Law Firm PLLC urges patients to make use of these resources before choosing a hospital for their surgery or treatment plan. Mr. Najdovski warns that just as there are doctors who have a more than average number of lawsuits against them, likewise there are hospitals which seem to attract more lawsuits than others.

Using sites such as the New York State’s Hospital Profile at http://hospitals.nyhealth.gov can help patients make good decisions about which hospital to use for their medical and surgical treatment. Hospital quality measures indicate how well a hospital provides care for its patients, especially in the specific areas of heart conditions, pneumonia care, surgical infection prevention, performance of coronary artery bypass grafts, angioplasties and pediatric heart surgeries, such as correction of Tetralogy of Fallot.

Beware: there is a growing tendency for hospitals which have realized that they have made a mistake or have negligently treated a patient to contact the patient to "apologize" for their carelessness, says attorney Najdovski, the Founding Member of The Najdovski Law Firm PLLC. Of course on a non-life threatening or minimal injury case, this may satisfy many people. But what is startling is that the internal department at hospitals commonly known as "Risk Management" offices (as in, managing how to pay out as little money as possible to aggrieved patients) actually contact patients who have suffered devastating problems with their health. Many times this "apology" is enough to stop the patient from bringing a lawsuit against the hospital. Frankly, although it may seem endearing, heart-warming and nice of them to admit a mistake, just remember that when your cappuccino in their office is long cold, you then have to go home and live with it.

According to an article on injuryboard.com, hospitals are working hard to minimize lawsuits by making many more apologies to patients than they used to. "Hospital officials are hoping saying ‘we’re sorry’ will cut down on lawsuits and save money," the article states. The new trend is being investigated at several hospitals across the country, but it is not clear whether it will make a difference in the number of patients who choose to sue.

Our system of law has developed to compensate individuals who have experienced medical malpractice. An apology from a hospital is nice, but should not be confused with rightful compensation for some patients who have truly suffered from a hospital’s errors. Attorney Najdovski states that the pain of being involved in a medical malpractice case could be avoided through researching the hospital first.

Attorney Najdovski urges that patients do not use the New York State’s Hospital Profile site as their only means of research. After carrying out basic web-research, patients should also contact people at the hospital and other patients of the hospital before making a decision. You are always free to contact Mr. Najdovski directly to obtain his opinion regarding your proposed treatment and his experience with whatever particular doctor or hospital you intend to use.

I'm sitting here with Rey, and we were talking a little bit. Four years ago, Rey came to the United States from Taiwan, and as he calls it, he had to speak "Engrish" for a few years before he really learned the language.

We're just sitting here, doing some work, and I told him that patience is everything. I told him that the reason why I am successful in life is that I've been patient.

I was successful business-wise when I was younger, but I was so impatient that I kept sabotaging myself along the way. When you are impatient you begin to sabotage everything you do - instead of letting things play out naturally and happen the way that they are supposed to, you force things. When you force something, you turn other people off - in both business and your personal life.

So how does this relate to dating?

I will tell you exactly how. For instance, I was supposed to have a date for lunch today. As I was driving to meet her, I was on the phone with my brother, talking about the Mets being in first place (which, by the way, is fantastic and is also about patience!)

So I was on my way there, and the woman I was supposed to meet told me that something came up at the last minute for her business and she would need to meet later on. Unfortunately, my schedule is pretty tight during the week, but I told her that was no problem at all. We texted back and forth and we set up a date for another time.

Most people would have reacted to that experience by saying, oh, what a flake - canceling at the last minute? What's up with that?

But something came up! It's called being understanding to other people's needs and their lifestyles. Just because it didn't transpire in the way you expected it to doesn't mean that you have to react in that way. It's not about you.

It's all about developing patience. The more patient you are the better things are going to be for you. Something I tell anybody that I coach is that we are out there to flirt with people today and get to know people today. When we're out meeting people today, you might find somebody that you'd like to take out today.

Or you might meet somebody that you just don't connect with today. But if you're patient and open, you might run into them again in a few months and they might be ready to talk.

You're building your social network not only for today, but also for the future. As you can see, nothing is really in the past. You might think that the past is ruining your present, but it's not.

So be patient in everything you do. If you have patience, good things will come to you - from money to love to friendship and everything else.

When Rey was speaking Engrish, he hated it and didn't want to speak it anymore. But he was patient and by being patient, he now speaks English better than many native English speakers.

As a patient you have the right to be fully informed by your primary health care provider about any treatments or surgeries that he or she recommends. It is the legal responsibility of your physician to obtain your informed consent. If your doctor does not obtain your informed consent prior to any procedures and you have suffered adverse consequences, you may have the right to sue for damages resulting from medical malpractice. For an informed consent to be given, you must be provided with sufficient information regarding the procedure to make an educated decision. This information must include:

· Diagnosis; · What the treatment is intended to accomplish; · Benefits and risks associated with the treatment; and · What alternative treatments are available.

There are two forms of informed consent: express consent and implied consent. Express consent is when the patient's consent is given either in written form or verbally. Written express consents should have:

· The physician's name who discussed the treatment plan with the patient; · The name of the physician who will perform the tests or procedure; and · The date and time the consent form was signed, along with the location of signing.

Implied consent is not given in written form or verbally. Implied consent arises when a health care provider performs necessary diagnostic tests or procedures that are part of medical treatment the patient has expressly consented to. The informed consent is required before your doctor performs diagnostic tests or invasive treatment. Legally an informed consent is only valid for a specified period of time.

Once you have given informed consent, the physician is legally and ethically required to proceed. You have the option of withdrawing your consent at any time.

You have the additional right to refuse any treatment offered. Your refusal can be based on any personal reason, including religion. Once you have given informed refusal, the health care provider must ensure that you fully understand any possible consequences which may occur because you declined a recommended treatment. The doctor cannot, however, use coercion or deception to change your mind.

You are entitled to take time to consider your decision for an informed consent or refusal fully. Although as a patient you are permitted to either consent to or refuse treatment, you cannot demand and receive tests or treatment your physician deems unnecessary or unsafe.

You, as a patient, have responsibilities as well regarding informed consents or refusals. It is mandatory you listen carefully to your physician as he or she explains the recommended health care plan and, if you do not understand anything, to ask questions until you feel you understand completely what is proposed.

If you feel that you are a victim of doctor malpractice or hospital malpractice as a result of lack of informed consent then you should contact a qualified medical malpractice lawyer immediately.