Home
Top AuthorsTop ArticlesArticles WritingSubmit ArticlesRSSFQA 
 
Reference & Education
Childhood education
College
Cryptozoology
Environmental
Homeschooling
International studies
K 12 Education
Language
Learning disabilities
Learning Methods and Theories
Legal
Online education
Other Education
Philosophy
Psychology
Reference & Education
Science
Short Stories
Sociology
Troubled Teens
Tutoring
Weather

 
 
 

Corning Incorporated: A Network of Alliances


Publisher: Jeff Stats
Date: 2007-04-05
Word count : 1455
Ranking Click at the star to rank
Ranking Level
0
No. ranking 0
 
Sponsored Links
Corning is a company with a multi million profits and a century long history. James Houghton is a current CEO of the company that is facing a few dilemmas and they have to be resolved as soon as possible in order for the company’s further successful development. The core of the company’s operations and main course of business was edge-cutting technology, however at this time their technology is not a market leader and they have to decide what to do with their three major branches. They need to remodel or cut off one or two of them so that they can carry on gaining leading positions in the business world and produce excellent product. Lab sciences division is one of the three vital arteries in the body of the Corning company. Currently this branch is not being he most success, although in the course of past seven years, according to the financial statement, it has been the most profitable of the three and future forecast predicts further growth. The problem arises though, Ciba-Geigy a Swedish company who owns 50% of the Ciba Corning corporation is a partner who needs to be taken into consideration. They could buy Corning’s share for 150$ million and Corning would be free to do whatever they want. Ciba is a very well developed company with reputation and mutual business. On the other hand the competitors are spending huge amounts of money on the R&D, three times as much as Corning. It’s inefficient for real breakthrough and simply dangerous considering the possibility of losses if the competitors win over their market share which can happen if they do not increase R&D funding. Corning would be probably better off in case of terminating mutual business with Ciba-Geigy and turning to expanding fields such as professional testing for AIDS or chemical addiction. Combining forces with three other companies each of which is a professional in a specific field (pharmaceutical, clinical and environmental testing) Corning would be able to gain leading positions again. Spending almost 500$million on the investment into the purchase of such promising companies and getting back about 150$ million from selling of Ciba would be an optimal decision. This choice is a very risky one, although if money starts working immediately on the new products of the three new entities, it would most probably bring more profit than Ciba with its low return. Considering the history of the company and its quality orientation, a new redirection of funds into a more perspective business would be a better idea than sticking with a more or less safe but slowly dying company. Corning is a company with a big experience in laboratory testing and important connections and partnerships that will help maintain high profit levels. Another business sector Corning is involved in is communications sector. In 1980s when this field was only developing and Corning had a lot of patents on fiber and fiber and fiber-making products, it was receiving high profits. In a few years market for fibers grew immensely and Corning as a leading producer in the field gathered big dividends. The problem in the present time is that the customer needs a new approach with the fiber technology. For instance Corning should be focusing on the local systems rather than on long distance links which was already saturated enough in the US market. Besides it was a right decision to start introducing new sophisticated terminal peripherals to large communication companies and computer corporations. This is a way of the moving progress and together with these new technologies in computer sphere and local systems. Taking into consideration the amount of money that Corning is going to spend on the development of its laboratory testing division, it should hold back from big purchases and new joint ventures. The possible PCO’s partnership with IBM seems like a good project with a lot of potential but it should not be considered at the moment. PCO is able to develop on its own and thus it is on a safer side for the company to just continue doing what it was and stick to the 10$ million profit a year, even incurring operating loses. The proposal with 100$ million investment into expending the U.S. capacity and making tough new fibers for the service homes is a prospectively successful and profitable venture. Distributing those 100$ million in three years is a smart decision and with growing market for such technologies it would bring profit without a doubt. The core strategy of the company coincides with such decision as Corning has been in this business for a long time besides it is only going to strengthen their evolving network organization. Interrelated businesses will only win from this situation and gain a supportive partner in the face of PCO, such businesses as their testing laboratories in need of local operations based on fiber produced by the same company. The third division of Corning’s business is television glass. In 1988 company had to close three big factories manufacturing television glass, the reason for it being an increasing expansion of Asian and especially Japanese competitors. Their production was of higher quality and definitely with newer high-tech features. Moreover one of the Japanese companies bought considerable shareholding in one of Corning’s companies Owens Illinois. In this difficult situation of severe competition and forced reduction of business units, Corning has to make a decision as to further activities in this field. Suggestion to cooperate with Asahi and to sell 49% of its glass business would be a helping hand for a drowning company. Asahi as a Japanese entity and a former business partner for a long period of time, which guarantees a secure environment, would be perfect candidate for the creation of a new fruitful alliance. It would provide an ensured cooperation with other Japanese companies and help survive on the American market. On the other side Corning will acquire resources for the development of liquid crystal displays which are major products of the future. Timing of this venture is suitable for both companies, as the foreign wants a helper to promote itself on an unknown market and Corning wants a technologically update partner. In case of purchase of Corning by Asahi, the company would place itself in a new position in a strategic sense. Clearly in this situation Asahi would be the one with most control, because of their connections with Japanese TV manufactures and cutting edge technology. Thus Corning is left a role of the marketer and public relations specialist. On the other side there is a wonderful possibility to spend time and money for R&D to design an innovative model of liquid crystal displays, the goal that was set when creating a mutual business with Asahi. As was already said, Corning in this partnership will not be the one in leading position, but rather in learning and in case of successful technology development it will be a profitable one. In such egalitarian corporation as Corning it is important to keep in mind that although all ‘children’ companies are independently run, there needs to be a firm controlling hand. Big money is involved in all three of possible ventures described above and by taking risk with any of them, company can lose a lot. On the other side by taking these steps or not taking them as in IBM case, they can realize huge profits and bigger market share due to increased quality (alliance of three professional laboratories) and technological innovations (in Japanese partnership). According to their corporate strategy that follows from their strategy wheel, Corning aims at keeping businesses in four different areas. Specialty materials such as video displays, LCD, memory storage; communications- optical fibers and fiber optic cables; laboratory products and testing; consumer house ware-cookware, tableware, sunglasses are those areas. Regarding the companies current situation keeping all four of them and maintaining a 25% share of the whole company business is not a strategically secure decision. House ware division needs to be at least reduced to 15%-10% in order to lessen spending on the part which is not company’s unique competency. Efforts should be focused on the other three segments to return invested money and to make profit. Narrowing down production and operations would only save company money, human resources and help maintain focus on the ultimate goal of surviving.

Jeff Stats is an expert at Mindrelief.net. Our custom essay writing service is a great chance for you to present an essay of the highest standard to your professor. The assistance of our writers is a priceless input in your professional development. Order college essay or research paper from our writing service.


 

Corning Incorporated: A Network of Alliances Keywords:

Corning Inc      business essay      management essay      Corning Incorporated: A Network of Alliances      Reference & Education      Reference & Education     

 
     
 
 

Related Article:Corning Incorporated: A Network of Alliances

Collapse All
 

How to Identify, Form and Capitalize on Strategic Alliances

Andrew Nester 2008-03-30
Title: How to Identify, Form and Capitalize on Strategic Alliances
The last decade has been a decade of change in how companies manage their resources, obtain funding, and do business. This change has been fueled by: the Internet, innovation, competition, available human resources, market conditions and the capital required to build a business. Strategic alliances have become the vehicle of choice for supporting this change.

Today's businesses are wholeheartedly embracing strategic alliances. Indeed, 80% of businesses surveyed viewed alliances as a means to:

- Rapidly gain new strategic capabilities and advantages in the marketplace. - Reduce the investment cash and ongoing operating expenses normally required to increase revenue and profits - Create less dilution and debt, thus more owner value.

Larger corporations are adding alliance specialists to their staff as a key organizational function. An Internet business grows it's revenue faster when joint ventures are formed. These two trends give credibility to the strategic alliance as a superior business strategy.

What is a Strategic Alliance?

An alliance is a relationship between two or more firms, or individuals, involving the sharing of complementary disciplines, technology, products, services, organizational structures, marketing and/or financial resources.

Types of Alliances

There are five fundamental types of alliances:

- Funding - Joint Venture - Merger/Acquisition - Product/Services - Cooperative

Each type of alliance is usually subdivided into several special categories to fit specific business needs.

Each strategic alliance uses varying types of agreements, from hand shakes and letters right up to tightly-defined legal documents. The needs of the parties involved, the depth of the involvement and the duration of the alliance all play a role in the type of agreement needed.

Every alliance has its own unique blend of economic, strategic and cultural circumstances. Each relationship is unique and should be executed according to its own set of guidelines and the core values of the alliance partner.

In order to determine what type of alliance is needed to support your business' goals you must first assess your business' strengths and weaknesses, your competitive position, emerging opportunities and the resources needed to achieve your goals.

Alliance Ownership

The ownership in the alliance can take many forms depending on the type, contribution, tax and legal ramifications and the goals of the alliance partners.

Alliance Strategy

After you have defined the type of strategic business alliance needed a strategy and business plan can be put into place. The strategy and business plan should define the following:

- Alliance needs - Core competency - Alliance goals and objectives - Criteria for success - Partners' roles and relationships - Characteristics of good and bad partners - Potential candidates - Operational details Deal structure with exit plan.

With your business plan and an alliance strategy plan in place a proactive search for an alliance partner can be implemented.

By establishing your own business alliance strategy then working with potential partners to jointly develop the alliance operating plan you lay the foundation for a mutually beneficial relationship.

Qualifying Potential Alliance Partners

Once potential alliance partners have been identified, the next step is to qualify them for:

- Complimentary strengths and available resources - Cultural and values compatibility - Organizational planning - Management structure and commitment to plans - Flexibility and willingness to truly establish a win/win situation.

Reasons Alliances Fail

Alliances fail because of:

- Cultural incompatibility (largest reason) - Inflexibility in adapting to changing needs - Not understanding the time commitment required to establish and maintain an alliance - Lack of a written plan - Poor day to day management of the relationship.

Reasons Alliances Succeed

Alliances succeed because of:

- Good planning (begin with the end in mind) - Proactivity An early start (it takes longer than you think) - Relationship building - Synergistic thinking - An early "win-win" or "no deal" decision - Proper staffing - Timing and follow through (these are key).

The end result of any alliance should be that "the sum has greater value to all participants than the parts."

For a Free copy "How to Identify, Form and Capitalize on Strategic Alliances" guide visit http://www.bizstrategies.biz/reports/strategic-alliances-report.html Andrew Nester is a Business Management Consultant providing Business Development Strategies and support to companies of all sizes. Visit our web site at http://www.bizstrategies.biz for additional information on Biz Strategies and Andrew's Bio.


 

Ford To Get Help From Other Automakers?

Chuck Smith 2006-08-29
Title: Ford To Get Help From Other Automakers?

In Dearborn, Michigan, the Ford Motor Company is trying to get right back on its feet after suffering several blows to its finances. And it looks like the company that used to be one of the giants and movers in the auto industry is now considering the idea of forming alliances so as to help them regain what they lost.

According to sources, this auto manufacturer is looking at the situation and is considering if alliances would be helpful to the company. The company is even thinking of having other auto companies and manufacturers as their alliances. Perhaps this is because the company believes that the other car makers would be able to assist them pick up the pieces.

Though the company would continuously be producing Ford Country Sedan parts and other Ford parts, products, and vehicles for the market, Ford would be undergoing a restructuring. It would be William Clay Ford Jr., the chief executive for the company, who would be taking the lead in the whole restructuring process. And it seems like Ford has already been able to communicate with the chief person for the Nissan and Renault brands, Carlos Ghosn. However, what happened during the meeting was not announced to the public for Ford believes that the topic is quite sensitive on their part.

On the other hand, it seems like such a meeting between Ford and Ghosn had helped lift up the company’s shares. In fact, investors may have found the act to be an intelligent move for the Ford Motor Company. The Ford shares have risen some 34 cents which is a good movement at that.

The alliance was not yet confirmed and put in paper. As per the talk between Ford and Ghosn, it seems like this was just Ford’s way of checking which auto companies would best be included in the alliance that would help out the company. There are no reports at present regarding Ford having meetings and conversations with other heads of auto companies. One source even states, “There is outreach of all kinds – it’s not just Ford talking to people, it’s people talking to one another. You have to be prepared and game things out in a lot of ways.”


 

Love my Alliances, Hate Negotiation

Drew Stevens 2008-05-04
Title: Love my Alliances, Hate Negotiation
Everything in life is a compromise; everything in life is a negotiation. We all seem stifled by the word and implications that surround negotiating. Yet what most of us do not realize is that we have been negotiating since we were born. From the time we wanted a bottle or refused napping our education in negotiation began. In fact, research for this article illustrates that 43% of the American workforce changed jobs since 2006. And, the divorce rate in the United States hovers at over 53%.

However, we become increasingly befuddled by negotiation. We hold strong beliefs that negotiation is meant to be a battle. We begin negotiations on the defensive and seek to end them in a similar manner. The most vital idea to comprehend about negotiation is its definition. Negotiation is nothing more than an exchange of ideas and values between two or more parties with different interests. Conceptually negotiation is a communication and critical thinking exercise inducing creative problem solving. This article seeks to address ways in which you can negotiate and still move away with your credibility and friendships in tact.

The best concept for understanding negotiation is to indicate what it isn’t. We first need to debunk the myths.

Myth: Negotiation is about winning and losing. The myth of win-lose is ancient. Validation of winning is not bequeathing more concessions than the other party. One simply needs to be concerned with the amount of take. This denotes loss.

Myth: Negotiation is about power All people in a negotiation have power. If two sides are negotiating each as an equal amount of power, one desires something from the other. Yet negotiation is not so much about power, it is about honesty or lack thereof. Power stems from the side that enables it. Donald Trump by nature believes he has power due to wealth and notoriety, yet if he desires something from someone else the power shifts. The larger concern is not relinquishing power to the opposing side.

Myth: Negotiation is about chicanery In reality, negotiation is about resolving an issue where both sides obtain equal value by amicably and honestly agreeing to terms. However, negotiation is similar to chess, strategies are used and sometimes held so that each party gains more than they requested. Rather than lie, most negotiators are honest, they simply do not fully disclose information.

Myth: All negotiations are about prices and are sales related Nothing is further from the truth. Negotiations stem from all walks of life: from dating, to deciding upon a movie to noise decibels. Negotiating establishes boundaries and how far each side allows another within them.

Perhaps the most understood principle of negotiation is a requirement to plan. Most often, negotiations fail due to improper procedures, paperwork or misread issues. Planning is the first and vital step in every negotiation. Each party should strategize to define the motives of each side, goals that might be addressed, time frames and players. Research affirms that in 73% of most negotiators are unprepared. This step is vital to assist in moving forward. Good planning and comprehension help to avoid miscues and maintain proper and efficient conversation. Exemplars of good negotiation techniques are barely surprised by new information.

Negotiations are mixed motive situations. Each side arrives with a variety of goals and objectives- even timeframes. What appears urgent to one; is apathetic to another. It is imperative that issues be immediately addressed. Most importantly, the issues must be documented so all parties agree without a misunderstanding. A foppish issue should not resurface at a latter time. The more detailed the documentation the easier it becomes to facilitate conversation. Once agreed to, timetables should be established so as not to languish on any one issue.

Negotiation is information and relationship dependent. Information is crucial to negotiation. The data need be specific; it is easier to comprehend and complete issues. Typically a tactical ploy to assist concessions, most data is not displayed. Negotiators should then decifer the most imperative issues first do that all needed data is disclosed making for effective conversations. Coincidentally, conversations are more placid when parties are familiar with each other. Particular interest is implicitly displayed since familiarity with both parties shares a common interest- “saving face”. Dignity is a traditional process. Whether in business or amongst friends, all desire to maintain honor, especially with familiarity of the parties. As the cliché states familiarity breeds content; the more familiarity with someone the easier the negotiation!

Egos and Communication. Another crucial component for negotiation success is to check you baggage and your ego at the door. Good negotiators know they are purposeful and do not advertise their success. A negotiation is concerned with mutual agreement not wins and losses. Keeping egos in check helps alliances and other desired relationships.

Additionally, all negotiators need reminders for ears and eyes and not mouth. Too often negotiators tend to spoil alliances by speaking too much. Peter Drucker once stated, “Communication is often about what is not stated”. Listening enables all to understand issues, allow for issues that might go unstated and strategically enable the “opponent” to move first. The alliance builders understand the vitality of listening, it is a practiced art form.

Compromise, Commitment and Conclusion. Negotiation would not exist if not for the power and the reciprocity of compromise. Concessions enable negotiators to agree on small things to assist in declaring small victories. Accommodations negate foolish issues and streamline discussion. Once decided, agree to commitment and document so as not to rehash. Trivial details take time away from other important issues. It is more important to move forward then review unnecessary data. Once the issue is complete, move forward or conclude, it allows less time for pondering decisions.

To allay any fears of negotiating, it is best to align this business tactic with athletics, it is a learned format not born. Admittedly, there exist individuals that love to converse and banter yet negotiation is not an easy skill. It takes patience, persistence and proper listening to understand the issues. Negotiation is a part of everything we do in life, almost every day. It is a skill that combines crucial critical thinking, reciprocity, and professional communication. It is not easy to win friends and influence decisions in negotiation, yet if we understand motives, create a thorough plan and expect the unexpected, each negotiation we have becomes easier and more effective. Negotiation increases our perception, our patience and our resolve to maintain business relationships.


Copyright (c) 2007 Drew Stevens PhD


 

The Importance of Developing a Plan for Strategic Alliances

Christian Fea 2008-04-23
Title: The Importance of Developing a Plan for Strategic Alliances
Strategic alliances have become a major factor in today's business models. Strategic alliances can enable the business owner to offer more services to their most valued clients ' and for many businesses, strategic alliances are the most profitable avenue of revenues.

Strengths of Strategic Alliances

According to recent research, 80% of surveyed CEOs found strategic alliances beneficial for several purposes:

-Quickly enter into the marketplace

-Promptly obtain technology advancements without research costs

-Minimize the budgetary costs typically associated with growth investments

To ascertain what type of strategic alliance is right for you, it is important that you assess your business thoroughly. Are you looking to penetrate a greater volume of the market share? Are you looking to reach a potential partner's customer base? Would you like to launch a new product line? Understanding your specific goals ' as well as your market position, strengths, weaknesses, and available resources ' will help you craft an appropriate strategic alliance.

However, the main reason why strategic alliances fail is because at least one of the partners is not happy with the results. Why does this occur? In most cases, the strategic alliance fails because a solid plan was not created at the outset of the endeavor.

Know Your Business ' and Your Partner's

All strategic planning deals with three key questions:

-What do we do? It may sound simple, but to effectively join efforts with a strategic partner, you must have a good concept of what your business offers. Without a clear defined understanding of every aspect of your goods and/or services, it is nearly impossible to target a valuable strategic partner.

-Who do we serve? Every business has a target customer or client. That doesn't necessarily mean that your business will solely market to that target profile, but it gives you a deep understanding for who is using your products. This allows you to key in on the specifics when choosing an alliance partner.

-Who is our competition? In order to stay at least one step ahead, it is important to keep informed as to who your competitors are and what they are doing. By placing your head in the sand like an ostrich on this issue only gives your competitors an edge on rising above your business. In order to compete in any business, you must not only "Keep up with the Jones," but you must beat them. A huge benefit to creating a strategic alliance partner is that often a business can avoid competition by aligning with proper partners.

Develop Your Plan

Alliances succeed with good planning. Whether you are looking to join email marketing campaigns, or perhaps a new product launch, a strategic alliance must have a clearly developed plan. Within your plan, you must clearly define several elements:

-Goals of the strategic alliance

-Specific marketing plans

-Analysis of cost sharing

-Defining the success of the relationship

-Encouragement of formal communication

-Marketing plan management details

Once a business and strategic alliance plan are in place, a proactive search for alliance partners can then be implemented. In order to create a solid strategic alliance, the first step is creating an in-depth strategic plan.

Copyright (c) 2008 Christian Fea

 

There''s Strength in Strategic Alliances

Christian Fea 2008-03-28
Title: There''s Strength in Strategic Alliances
An alliance is really just a business-to-business collaboration. Some people use the term business networking when referring to alliances. Alliances are formed for many reasons. When you are a small business owner, it's important to understand that there is a strength that can be utilized by strategic alliances, which may be overlooked in light of developing new business and developing additional revenue streams.

Small business alliances produce great rewards

Alliances between small businesses can offer additional benefits besides an increase in business. For instance, there are alliances of small business owners who proactively approach office supply corporations, internet service providers, health care providers and others on behalf of their membership base in order to secure better rates, additional services, and other benefits as the result of the alliance they've formed. There's strength in numbers when you're a small business owner, and if there are some products or services that you're looking for to enhance your business, chances are other small business owners are looking for similar products or services too. Why not form a strategic alliance and approach the product or service provider as a group to show that there is a need? There is a market and that you are aligned in hopes of doing business with large companies who are willing to work with you.

Capitalize upon merged resources

Additionally, small businesses can combine more limited resources in order to appear in more high traffic advertising areas than what each business could afford to do on its own. For instance, one small business networking group decided to participate in a local high traffic tradeshow, on behalf of the businesses that chose to be involved. Using the banner of their combined membership, the group divided and conquered the tradeshow fees and staffing for the event, with each participating company taking a time slot and promoting his or her business, as well as the alliance that they had formed. Not only did the participating members increase visibility and gain new business, the networking group added new members that were unaware of their activities, and thereby increased the strength of the alliance by providing a larger member base to include in negotiations.

Synergetic referrals

Another business group of marketing professionals found strength in forming a strategic alliance amongst themselves in order to offer a more comprehensive service package to large clients than any of the independent businesses was able to offer on their own. While they had to deal with some service crossover, it was determined that the size of the potential contracts outweighed what any one business would give up in revenue if crossover in services did occur. To handle the situation, it was written in the alliance contract that the company who brought the business to the table would have the last say in who would work on each contract and what the final compensation would be in the event of a crossover situation. The business owners were like-minded in that they all agreed to act in the best interest of the alliance's clients first in order to provide a service level above and beyond the large marketing communications firms with which they were competing. By operating as a virtual team of experts, this alliance was able to increase business for all of the participants; they understood the strength in approaching large clients with a more comprehensive offering than any of them could offer independently. It paid off in the end.

Leverage the strengths of a strategic alliance on behalf of your business and tap into clients and resources you may not have thought previously available.

Copyright (c) 2008 Christian Fea

 

Networking Through Strategic Alliances

Stephen Labuda 2006-02-02
Title: Networking Through Strategic Alliances

Networker's know that you always get back more from your network then you have to give to it. However, that should not stop you from thinking about new ways you can help the people in your network. Your network is full of people who would like to partner with you, though neither of you may have approached the idea or formalized a plan. Here are some suggestions for ways that you can form strategic alliances with other businesses in your network.

BNI (Business Networking International) coined the phrase “giver's gain”, which basically means that if you give referrals, leads or resources the recipients will want to repay you somehow. The problem is that as your network grows, it will become increasingly difficult to give referrals to everyone in your network.

This is somewhat counterintuitive because most people would think that as they add contacts to their network it will be easier to refer the new members of your network to each other. However, if you know five accountants it is difficult to refer to all five of them equally. One way to give back to your network is to develop a number of strategic alliances.

There are a few basic steps you should follow to help ensure that your new alliances are effective. First, be sure to think about what you want the alliance to accomplish. Are you simply trying to reach new potential customers? Or are you also trying to reduce your marketing costs? In general, think about the goals of the alliance. Here are some things you might want to consider.

- You will get access to the networks of your partners.
- You will get to associate your business with another, potentially, more established brand.
- You can decrease your overall marketing costs, while expanding your reach.
- You can learn from other businesses. What has been successful for them in the past?

Next you should think about who you want to partner with. If you are a Realtor, you might think of mortgage originators or real estate attorney's that you could partner with. Bear in mind that your partner does not have to have the same goals are you, but they should be complementary. Here are several ways you can potentially form and alliance with another business.

- Create an alliance with a customer - Creating a mutually beneficial relationship with a key customer can strengthen the relationship and reduce your risk of losing this key customer.

- Create an alliance with a market leader – If you are a small business, you may be able to reap hue rewards from partnering with the market leader in your area. You may be able to offer a level of local penetration that a big company may have trouble creating on it's own. The alliance may not offer a huge financial incentive for the small business but you can leverage the alliance in your own marketing program. If you are the market leader, consider partnering with a young, easer business that might be able to offer you this type of market penetration.

- Create an alliance with a non-profit organization – You might be able to create an alliance with a trade organization or local community organization, which offer not only direct rewards, but also in-direct rewards from helping a good cause.

- Create an alliance with a former employer – Your company may offer a service that complements the services offered by a former employer.

- Create an alliance with a competitor – while you have to pay very close attention to detail when partnering with a competitor, you might be able to tap into their resources to extend your reach. They might be a competitor, but may not have the specific expertise that you do. For example, many people would consider Yahoo! and Microsoft's MSN internet portal to be competitors, but MSN recognized Yahoo! Strengths in keyword driven advertising and started featuring Yahoo! Ads with their search results. Of course, MSN is now developing their own contextual advertising system, which means the partnership is coming to an end soon.

- Create an alliance with a parelell industry – simply stated, find another business in your market but that is not a direct competitor and then team up to market to the same customer base. Each company can pitch in financially and see incremental results from their marketing activities.

Planning out exactly how the alliance will work is the next step. You and your partner should clearly outline what each party is going to be responsible for and how results are going to be monitored. Be sure to discuss the costs involved in the alliance and make sure that each party has a clear understanding of what all of the costs will be. Here are some ideas to consider.

- Ask your partner to display your literature and/or products. A Realtor may be able to display brochure from a mortgage broker in their office or include it in the packet of information they present new clients.

- Ask your partner to link to your website from theirs. An accounting firm may be able to place a link to your financial planning practice on their website.

- Include your brochure in a partners mailings. A delivery company might be willing to include your brochure in the invoices they send to their customers each month.

- Develop joint marketing materials that promote both businesses and share the expenses of implementing the plan. For example, a handyman and a landscaper may develop a direct mail piece that promotes both companies and then each company can contribute to the mailing expenses.

- Develop a “preferred partner” program that offers customers a financial incentive to buy products in tandem from two companies at once. For example, a car dealership might form a partnership with a service station and offer maintenance bundled with the purchase price of a car. A health club may offer a joint membership to a local tennis or pool club.

- Develop a seminar with another business – develop a educational seminar program with a business in your industry and then market the events as a team.

- Publish news about the businesses you have developed an alliance with.

- Introduce your new partners to your key clients. Perhaps you can invite your partner to events you are involved in.

- Serve as a sponsor for events your partners are involved in.

Once you have set up your alliance and implemented your plan, it is critical that the lines of communication stay open and that you pay attention to the relationship you have formed. Check in with your partner to make sure they are happy with the way things are going.

Set up a weekly meeting or conference call with your partner and go through a progress report. You may also find it helpful to create a “report card” for your project before it begins. Base your report card on the goals you laid out early in the relationship and then revisit it over time. By laying out the goals in advance, each person involved with the project will understand what is expected of them. In addition, it is harder to ignore setbacks and bumps in the road if expectations are fully developed and everyone is on the same page before the project begins.

The most common mistakes involve failing to clearly communicate through each stage of the alliances growth. Think about the overall value proposition, where each parties goals are aligned and mismatched, the level of commitment or excitement from each party. Always think about how the alliance can become a win-win for everyone involved. If you do not think you can really add value, don't participate because you do not want to damage your credibility. Finally, if the alliance simply does not add measurable value to your business, do not participate.

Creating these formal alliances will help you develop and strengthen the relationships you already have. Power networkers can create multiple alliances with multiple members of their network. These alliances have the added benefit of allowing you to add value to a number of businesses without having to actually give specific referrals to a number of businesses individually.


 

The Importance of Developing a Plan for Strategic Alliances

Christian Fea 2008-04-23
Title: The Importance of Developing a Plan for Strategic Alliances

Copyright (c) 2008 Christian Fea

Strategic alliances have become a major factor in today's business models. Strategic alliances can enable the business owner to offer more services to their most valued clients ' and for many businesses, strategic alliances are the most profitable avenue of revenues.

Strengths of Strategic Alliances

According to recent research, 80% of surveyed CEOs found strategic alliances beneficial for several purposes:

-Quickly enter into the marketplace

-Promptly obtain technology advancements without research costs

-Minimize the budgetary costs typically associated with growth investments

To ascertain what type of strategic alliance is right for you, it is important that you assess your business thoroughly. Are you looking to penetrate a greater volume of the market share? Are you looking to reach a potential partner's customer base? Would you like to launch a new product line? Understanding your specific goals ' as well as your market position, strengths, weaknesses, and available resources ' will help you craft an appropriate strategic alliance.

However, the main reason why strategic alliances fail is because at least one of the partners is not happy with the results. Why does this occur? In most cases, the strategic alliance fails because a solid plan was not created at the outset of the endeavor.

Know Your Business ' and Your Partner's

All strategic planning deals with three key questions:

-What do we do? It may sound simple, but to effectively join efforts with a strategic partner, you must have a good concept of what your business offers. Without a clear defined understanding of every aspect of your goods and/or services, it is nearly impossible to target a valuable strategic partner.

-Who do we serve? Every business has a target customer or client. That doesn't necessarily mean that your business will solely market to that target profile, but it gives you a deep understanding for who is using your products. This allows you to key in on the specifics when choosing an alliance partner.

-Who is our competition? In order to stay at least one step ahead, it is important to keep informed as to who your competitors are and what they are doing. By placing your head in the sand like an ostrich on this issue only gives your competitors an edge on rising above your business. In order to compete in any business, you must not only "Keep up with the Jones," but you must beat them. A huge benefit to creating a strategic alliance partner is that often a business can avoid competition by aligning with proper partners.

Develop Your Plan

Alliances succeed with good planning. Whether you are looking to join email marketing campaigns, or perhaps a new product launch, a strategic alliance must have a clearly developed plan. Within your plan, you must clearly define several elements:

-Goals of the strategic alliance

-Specific marketing plans

-Analysis of cost sharing

-Defining the success of the relationship

-Encouragement of formal communication

-Marketing plan management details

Once a business and strategic alliance plan are in place, a proactive search for alliance partners can then be implemented. In order to create a solid strategic alliance, the first step is creating an in-depth strategic plan.


 

There''s Strength in Strategic Alliances

Christian Fea 2008-03-28
Title: There''s Strength in Strategic Alliances

Copyright (c) 2008 Christian Fea

An alliance is really just a business-to-business collaboration. Some people use the term business networking when referring to alliances. Alliances are formed for many reasons. When you are a small business owner, it's important to understand that there is a strength that can be utilized by strategic alliances, which may be overlooked in light of developing new business and developing additional revenue streams.

Small business alliances produce great rewards

Alliances between small businesses can offer additional benefits besides an increase in business. For instance, there are alliances of small business owners who proactively approach office supply corporations, internet service providers, health care providers and others on behalf of their membership base in order to secure better rates, additional services, and other benefits as the result of the alliance they've formed. There's strength in numbers when you're a small business owner, and if there are some products or services that you're looking for to enhance your business, chances are other small business owners are looking for similar products or services too. Why not form a strategic alliance and approach the product or service provider as a group to show that there is a need? There is a market and that you are aligned in hopes of doing business with large companies who are willing to work with you.

Capitalize upon merged resources

Additionally, small businesses can combine more limited resources in order to appear in more high traffic advertising areas than what each business could afford to do on its own. For instance, one small business networking group decided to participate in a local high traffic tradeshow, on behalf of the businesses that chose to be involved. Using the banner of their combined membership, the group divided and conquered the tradeshow fees and staffing for the event, with each participating company taking a time slot and promoting his or her business, as well as the alliance that they had formed. Not only did the participating members increase visibility and gain new business, the networking group added new members that were unaware of their activities, and thereby increased the strength of the alliance by providing a larger member base to include in negotiations.

Synergetic referrals

Another business group of marketing professionals found strength in forming a strategic alliance amongst themselves in order to offer a more comprehensive service package to large clients than any of the independent businesses was able to offer on their own. While they had to deal with some service crossover, it was determined that the size of the potential contracts outweighed what any one business would give up in revenue if crossover in services did occur. To handle the situation, it was written in the alliance contract that the company who brought the business to the table would have the last say in who would work on each contract and what the final compensation would be in the event of a crossover situation. The business owners were like-minded in that they all agreed to act in the best interest of the alliance's clients first in order to provide a service level above and beyond the large marketing communications firms with which they were competing. By operating as a virtual team of experts, this alliance was able to increase business for all of the participants; they understood the strength in approaching large clients with a more comprehensive offering than any of them could offer independently. It paid off in the end.

Leverage the strengths of a strategic alliance on behalf of your business and tap into clients and resources you may not have thought previously available.


 

Strategic Partnerships

Phil Morettini 2006-10-21
Title: Strategic Partnerships

Forming Partnerships, or Strategic Alliances, is one of the key elements that make up the business development function in technology companies. I believe that alliances are underutilized, in many ways. Conceived and executed properly, alliances can greatly extend the partner companies reach in the marketplace.

VARIOUS AND SUNDRY PARTNERSHIPS

There are many types of collaboration that fall under the umbrella of "Partnering". Let's examine a few of the most common:

Third Party Programs—Probably the best understood category of partnering. Partnering in this manner is generally low risk, but low reward for both parties. A program usually consists of many smaller partners gaining modest benefits from a larger company. The larger company gains (or at least the illusion) from having a large number of partners working with their product/technology.

Industry Consortiums—Represents another well-understood category. Mild benefits are usually obtained by the participating parties, including some publicity, a stamp of approval, and the opportunity to network with other consortium members. The unique aspect of this form of partnering is its one-to-many relationship, as opposed to "one-to-one" or "one-to-few" relationships found in most partnerships.

Sales Agents—Many people might not consider sales agent relationships partnerships, at least not strategic. But they certainly are. There is usually a minimum of entanglement here, simply a contract that provides a commission for sales generated or leveraged. The product doesn't change hands between the partners, and there is often less training and support involved, relative to other partnership types used for product distribution.

Service Agreements—These agreements occur when a company doesn't want to relinquish the sales function for its products, but for some reason it needs a third party for servicing. These agreements are common in high-end hardware markets, where 24/7 on-site support is critical. Storage Hardware or Mainframes are good examples. They are also seen in more commodity markets, where a company has decided that service/support isn't their core competency, and that a third party can handle service/support at a lower cost. The use of Indian Call Centers by PC manufacturers such as Dell is a recent example of this concept.

Distribution Agreements—This is a common, but often poorly executed form of partnership. The errors usually occur when the Channel partner is treated like an end-user, rather than the true partner they should be viewed as. Distributors and Resellers need to be treated as an extension of a company's sales force. Sadly, they often are not, leading to such misguided policies such as channel stuffing and over-distribution, which lead to problems that become extremely difficult to resolve.

Joint Marketing—Cooperation on marketing matters should be where most companies reap the greatest benefits. Partnering in this area is really low risk, can have great benefits, and is a great way to get started with a new partner. There are so many ways that companies can cooperate in joint marketing; the list is really only limited by your imagination. Some of the ways I've been able to utilize these types of partnerships include discounted product promotional bundles, trade show space cost-sharing, joint press releases (of course!), sharing of prospect and customer lists, referrals, and joint direct mailings. The great thing is that there are many areas to explore, to find overlap in the two companies interests.

Product Integration—Integrating the products of two companies is what often comes to mind when you think of partnerships. It can make great sense, and the potential rewards are great. However, there are some reasons for caution, prior to jumping straight into this, as I'll discuss below.

POTENTIAL PITFALLS

As discussed above, a partnership or alliance can take many forms. As a result, there is a lot of confusion and disagreement as to what even constitutes a "good" partnership. Let's take a closer look at two partnering categories, and some common missteps:

THE PaRtner-ship

You see a great many press releases go out trumpeting the partnership between company A and company B. The release goes on to discuss the great benefits that will accrue to customers and the two companies making the announcement. The language tends to be vague and laced with terminology like "synergy" and "market leading value proposition". More often than not, that initial press release is the high point of the partnership, and little is heard about it subsequently. You may have heard the term "slide-ware" to describe products that exist only in PowerPoint. This type of partnership is the alliance equivalent to slide-ware—I call it a "PaRtner-ship."

PRODUCT INTEGRATION FIASCO

On the other end of the partnership spectrum, technical folks usually think of alliances in terms of product integration. Technical integration can be the basis for a great partnership. However, it's a lot of work and a big commitment for both parties. The danger is that the partners too quickly dive head long into the product integration work, basing their decision on an impulsive belief that it "makes sense".

In a typical scenario, the two products are complementary, and from an engineering (and often customer) perspective it looks like a marriage made in heaven. Several dangers are lying in the weeds, however. First of all, any product development effort runs a high risk of failure. When you put together two disparate engineering teams who have never worked together on a project, that risk rises exponentially. Usually both engineering departments have their own product releases to worry about concurrently, which are always higher priority. Lack of communication, low priority, cultural differences and ego can easily conspire to lead to a failed integration project, or at least one lacking the features to be of much leverage in the market. At this point, the partners have spent a lot of money and precious engineering resources with little in return, leaving finger pointing, and a search for scapegoats as the next step.

In addition, it takes much more than good product integration for commercial success by the partners. If there isn't a solid plan for marketing cooperation and distribution (see above!), even technically elegant product integration partnerships will leave both parties disappointed. Alliances that are born from product integration, unless carefully thought out and efficiently executed, can lead to disappointment by one or both of the partners.

There are many "gotchas" involved with working together to push and pull the combined solution in the market. It helps to have some practice working together prior to making the big bet on technical integration. That's why I often recommend to my clients that product integration be a step down the road in an embryonic partnership, not a beginning.

PARTNERSHIPS MAKE SENSE—BUT EXECUTION IS KEY

So are partnerships to be avoided? Not at all! They are one of the areas that can make be a huge differentiator for your company in a competitive market. But the take-away message here is that too many partnerships are conceived as great ideas—and peak right there. Like most business activities, the devil is in the details, and execution is the key to success. When I'm working with smaller clients with limited capital for marketing and sales, I often recommend an aggressive partnering program. If executed correctly, the company and its partners can gain cost-efficiencies and marketing economies of scale far exceeding their own size. But I have two key pieces of advice before you embark on a new partnering program:

1) The very definition of a partnership is a "win-win" relationship for BOTH parties. Takers don't build winning partnerships—givers do. Offer to take the first step, do the first piece of the project. A partner that believes you are acting in his best interests will be very impressed, and willing to provide support that you never dreamed of. Build that relationship by being the first to "give"; the trust you build will came back to you multiple times and set the stage for a profitable, long term partnership.

2) Do start, but start small. I've discussed above the many pitfalls of moving too fast. It's best to pick something easy, with obvious benefits to both parties. Working successfully on a small project creates momentum, and helps build the trust and familiarity that is crucial to success on more ambitious future projects. I will often suggest a simple list swap of prospects as an initial step. If either party views even that with suspicion, a blind mailing can be done to each other's list, where the actual lists don't change hands. Building a prospect or customer list is very capital-intensive; by partnering with just one other company, you can both double your lists overnight. It's almost a certain Win-Win, creating excellent leverage, and no financial investment by either party. It's easy to succeed, and sets the stage for discussions on additional collaboration.

I'm sure you get the picture—does this make sense to you? Send me your comments so we can get this discussion going.


 

Networking Through Strategic Alliances

Stephen Labuda 2006-02-02
Title: Networking Through Strategic Alliances

Networker's know that you always get back more from your network then you have to give to it. However, that should not stop you from thinking about new ways you can help the people in your network. Your network is full of people who would like to partner with you, though neither of you may have approached the idea or formalized a plan. Here are some suggestions for ways that you can form strategic alliances with other businesses in your network.

BNI (Business Networking International) coined the phrase "giver's gain", which basically means that if you give referrals, leads or resources the recipients will want to repay you somehow. The problem is that as your network grows, it will become increasingly difficult to give referrals to everyone in your network.

This is somewhat counterintuitive because most people would think that as they add contacts to their network it will be easier to refer the new members of your network to each other. However, if you know five accountants it is difficult to refer to all five of them equally. One way to give back to your network is to develop a number of strategic alliances.

There are a few basic steps you should follow to help ensure that your new alliances are effective. First, be sure to think about what you want the alliance to accomplish. Are you simply trying to reach new potential customers? Or are you also trying to reduce your marketing costs? In general, think about the goals of the alliance. Here are some things you might want to consider.

- You will get access to the networks of your partners.
- You will get to associate your business with another, potentially, more established brand.
- You can decrease your overall marketing costs, while expanding your reach.
- You can learn from other businesses. What has been successful for them in the past?

Next you should think about who you want to partner with. If you are a Realtor, you might think of mortgage originators or real estate attorney's that you could partner with. Bear in mind that your partner does not have to have the same goals are you, but they should be complementary. Here are several ways you can potentially form and alliance with another business.

- Create an alliance with a customer - Creating a mutually beneficial relationship with a key customer can strengthen the relationship and reduce your risk of losing this key customer.

- Create an alliance with a market leader - If you are a small business, you may be able to reap hue rewards from partnering with the market leader in your area. You may be able to offer a level of local penetration that a big company may have trouble creating on it's own. The alliance may not offer a huge financial incentive for the small business but you can leverage the alliance in your own marketing program. If you are the market leader, consider partnering with a young, easer business that might be able to offer you this type of market penetration.

- Create an alliance with a non-profit organization - You might be able to create an alliance with a trade organization or local community organization, which offer not only direct rewards, but also in-direct rewards from helping a good cause.

- Create an alliance with a former employer - Your company may offer a service that complements the services offered by a former employer.

- Create an alliance with a competitor - while you have to pay very close attention to detail when partnering with a competitor, you might be able to tap into their resources to extend your reach. They might be a competitor, but may not have the specific expertise that you do. For example, many people would consider Yahoo! and Microsoft's MSN internet portal to be competitors, but MSN recognized Yahoo! Strengths in keyword driven advertising and started featuring Yahoo! Ads with their search results. Of course, MSN is now developing their own contextual advertising system, which means the partnership is coming to an end soon.

- Create an alliance with a parelell industry - simply stated, find another business in your market but that is not a direct competitor and then team up to market to the same customer base. Each company can pitch in financially and see incremental results from their marketing activities.

Planning out exactly how the alliance will work is the next step. You and your partner should clearly outline what each party is going to be responsible for and how results are going to be monitored. Be sure to discuss the costs involved in the alliance and make sure that each party has a clear understanding of what all of the costs will be. Here are some ideas to consider.

- Ask your partner to display your literature and/or products. A Realtor may be able to display brochure from a mortgage broker in their office or include it in the packet of information they present new clients.

- Ask your partner to link to your website from theirs. An accounting firm may be able to place a link to your financial planning practice on their website.

- Include your brochure in a partners mailings. A delivery company might be willing to include your brochure in the invoices they send to their customers each month.

- Develop joint marketing materials that promote both businesses and share the expenses of implementing the plan. For example, a handyman and a landscaper may develop a direct mail piece that promotes both companies and then each company can contribute to the mailing expenses.

- Develop a "preferred partner" program that offers customers a financial incentive to buy products in tandem from two companies at once. For example, a car dealership might form a partnership with a service station and offer maintenance bundled with the purchase price of a car. A health club may offer a joint membership to a local tennis or pool club.

- Develop a seminar with another business - develop a educational seminar program with a business in your industry and then market the events as a team.

- Publish news about the businesses you have developed an alliance with.

- Introduce your new partners to your key clients. Perhaps you can invite your partner to events you are involved in.

- Serve as a sponsor for events your partners are involved in.

Once you have set up your alliance and implemented your plan, it is critical that the lines of communication stay open and that you pay attention to the relationship you have formed. Check in with your partner to make sure they are happy with the way things are going.

Set up a weekly meeting or conference call with your partner and go through a progress report. You may also find it helpful to create a "report card" for your project before it begins. Base your report card on the goals you laid out early in the relationship and then revisit it over time. By laying out the goals in advance, each person involved with the project will understand what is expected of them. In addition, it is harder to ignore setbacks and bumps in the road if expectations are fully developed and everyone is on the same page before the project begins.

The most common mistakes involve failing to clearly communicate through each stage of the alliances growth. Think about the overall value proposition, where each parties goals are aligned and mismatched, the level of commitment or excitement from each party. Always think about how the alliance can become a win-win for everyone involved. If you do not think you can really add value, don't participate because you do not want to damage your credibility. Finally, if the alliance simply does not add measurable value to your business, do not participate.

Creating these formal alliances will help you develop and strengthen the relationships you already have. Power networkers can create multiple alliances with multiple members of their network. These alliances have the added benefit of allowing you to add value to a number of businesses without having to actually give specific referrals to a number of businesses individually.



 
 

Leave Comment

Author Name*
:
Author Email*
:
Comment*
:
Security Code*
: captcha